You probably often see very conflicting views of the Turkish economy. If you are sick of my gloomy writings (hey, it is called the dismal science), there are plenty of columns and research reports painting a rosy view of the Turkish economy. So how can we reconcile these different assessments?
Well, the easiest way out is to argue that those writing the positive commentaries don’t know what they are talking about:) (I guess you could make the same argument for those with negative views, but I’ll be a little bit subjective for now). Some indeed don’t, and others have simply too much to gain from supporting the government’s economic policies- or too much to lose from criticizing them!:) But many positive assessments do indeed have valid points. As I argue in my latest Hurriyet Daily News column, it depends on which aspect of the economy you are looking at- and depending on that, the glass could seem half empty or half full:
I had other examples of conflicting views of the Turkish economy, but as usual I ran out of space. Here a few more, which you can go through after reading the column:
Turkey has quite a few number of dollar billionaires on Fortune’s annual list, at least when normalized to its GDP. However, have a look Forbes Global 500 list: How many Turkish companies do you see? Just one!
The highlight of the OECD’s fresh-out-of-the-oven report on the Turkish economy is, IMHO, the difference in productivity between large and small firms in Turkey. In fact, as they show in the report, their ratio is one of the highest in the world. So how do these small firms survive? By going informal: Not paying taxes, social security premiums, etc. This explains the skills/education differences between workers in large and small firms as well.
Last but not the least, the OECD report notes the decline in poverty and inequality in Turkey during the last decade, especially in a time when they were rising across the world. This is good news, even notwithstanding the fact that the fall in poverty and inequality has come to a halt in the last few years. But more importantly, as I discussed in a recent column, two out of three of Turkey’s children are under sever material deprivation:(
Changing gears, I also wanted to clarify a couple of things in the column: First, with regards to growth, all emerging markets benefited from the global liquidity flush, which was the main driver of Turkey’s “growth miracle”. Second, I mentioned the low interest rate as the factor that caused private debt to surge, but to be fair, it wasn’t the only factor: The macroeconomic stability and rising incomes in dollar terms because of the appreciating lira also caused debt to increase during the first few years of the AKP’s rule. More recently, the Central Bank’s de facto fixing of the exchange rate caused companies to increase their FX borrowing…
'via Blog this'
No comments:
Post a Comment